-What is the role of women in the novel?
The main
character, Ellie, is one of the key leaders of the group. She is strong
willed, organized, and very determined. Throughout the novel, Ellie is
faced with immense situations that she accurately responds to. “I was
still operating on sheer panic. I led them across the tennis court,
trying desperately to think”(84). Ellie used her panic to help gear her
thinking process in helping the group out, and it successfully worked. Ellie’s
role in the group was mainly to be the “thinker” of the group. She made a
lot of valuable decisions and created very important plans in helping the group
survive.
In the novel, Ellie grew in confidence and her character completely changed,
for the better, after going through outrageous life changing incidents. She did
most of the crucial work and was portrayed as the hard worker in the
group. Not only was she a great critical thinker, but Ellie was great at
acting based off of her instincts. Over countless occasions she helped
save peoples’ lives and put her life on risk. Although Corrie and Fi
played as lesser important roles than Ellie, they were still very crucial to
the group’s survival. “Fi seemed delicate and timid, and she even claimed
herself that she was, but she had a determination I hadn’t recognized
before. There was a spirit to her, a fire burning inside her
somewhere”(259).
The role of women in Tomorrow When
the War Began is portrayed as a very crucial and important role.
Each woman is depicted as strong and self motivated, who don’t require much
help from others. “I had to activate that determined voice in my brain:
If you do nothing, you’ll die”(237). Ellie was explaining how she got
back to focusing on her main concern, survival, and that she had to become
determined by herself or a different outcome would occur. The women,
especially Ellie, were strong because of the ways they handled situations and
how they used teamwork to benefit the group. Although in some novels, men
are portrayed as the key leaders of the group and basically the important,
valuable ones who take charge of groups, John Marsden did the opposite, and I
believe it worked perfectly.